Analysis – How Trustible Helps Organizations Comply With The EU AI Act

The forthcoming EU AI Act promises to be the most consequential global regulation for AI to date, impacting businesses of all sizes around the world.

What is the EU AI Act?

The EU AI Act sets a global precedent in AI regulation, emphasizing human rights in AI development and implementation of AI systems. While the eventual law will directly apply to EU countries, its extraterritorial reach will impact global businesses in profound ways. Global businesses producing AI-related applications or services that either impact EU citizens or supply EU-based companies will be responsible for complying with the EU AI Act. Failure to comply with the Act can result in fines up to 7% of global turnover or €35m for major violations, with lower penalties for SMEs and startups.

Importantly, the AI Act applies a tiered compliance approach, requiring each AI system to be classified as Unacceptable, High, Limited, and Minimal Risk. The compliance obligations scale with each tier. 

In our new white paper, we analyze each of the key obligations from the EU AI Act and how the Trustible Responsible AI Governance platform helps you comply with the law.

Navigating the evolving and complex landscape for AI governance requirements can be a real challenge for organizations. Trustible has created both a detailed analysis and a comprehensive cheat sheet comparing three important compliance frameworks: the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act. These guides are designed to help you understand each of the key obligations of all three frameworks and compare them against each other.

Share:

Related Posts

Informational image about the Trustible Zero Trust blog.

When Zero Trust Meets AI Governance: The Future of Secure and Responsible AI

Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping the enterprise security landscape. From predictive analytics to generative assistants, AI now sits inside nearly every workflow that once belonged only to humans. For CIOs, CISOs, and information security leaders, especially in regulated industries and the public sector, this shift has created both an opportunity and a dilemma: how do you innovate with AI at speed while maintaining the same rigorous trust boundaries you’ve built around users, devices, and data?

Read More

AI Governance Meets AI Insurance: How Trustible and Armilla Are Advancing AI Risk Management

As enterprises race to deploy AI across critical operations, especially in highly-regulated sectors like finance, healthcare, telecom, and manufacturing, they face a double-edged sword. AI promises unprecedented efficiency and insights, but it also introduces complex risks and uncertainties. Nearly 59% of large enterprises are already working with AI and planning to increase investment, yet only about 42% have actually deployed AI at scale. At the same time, incidents of AI failures and misuse are mounting; the Stanford AI Index noted a 26-fold increase in AI incidents since 2012, with over 140 AI-related lawsuits already pending in U.S. courts. These statistics underscore a growing reality: while AI’s presence in the enterprise is accelerating, so too are the risks and scrutiny around its use.

Read More