Analysis – Mapping the Requirements of NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act

Navigating the evolving and complex landscape for AI governance requirements can be a real challenge for organizations. Previously, Trustible created this comprehensive cheat sheet comparing three important compliance frameworks: the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act. This easy to understand visual maps the similarities and differences between these frameworks, providing a concise reference for organizations implementing responsible AI guardrails.

Now, we’ve gone deeper.

In our new white paper, we analyze each of the key obligations and compare them against each other. While there is overlap among key concepts and requirements, each one takes a slightly different approach to how an organization implements its AI governance structures, processes, and procedures. 

Trustible’s platform is configured to help you comply with all three frameworks, which are now being discussed as the fundamental building blocks of an AI governance strategy.

Read the Full Analysis

Share:

Related Posts

Informational image about the Trustible Zero Trust blog.

When Zero Trust Meets AI Governance: The Future of Secure and Responsible AI

Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping the enterprise security landscape. From predictive analytics to generative assistants, AI now sits inside nearly every workflow that once belonged only to humans. For CIOs, CISOs, and information security leaders, especially in regulated industries and the public sector, this shift has created both an opportunity and a dilemma: how do you innovate with AI at speed while maintaining the same rigorous trust boundaries you’ve built around users, devices, and data?

Read More

AI Governance Meets AI Insurance: How Trustible and Armilla Are Advancing AI Risk Management

As enterprises race to deploy AI across critical operations, especially in highly-regulated sectors like finance, healthcare, telecom, and manufacturing, they face a double-edged sword. AI promises unprecedented efficiency and insights, but it also introduces complex risks and uncertainties. Nearly 59% of large enterprises are already working with AI and planning to increase investment, yet only about 42% have actually deployed AI at scale. At the same time, incidents of AI failures and misuse are mounting; the Stanford AI Index noted a 26-fold increase in AI incidents since 2012, with over 140 AI-related lawsuits already pending in U.S. courts. These statistics underscore a growing reality: while AI’s presence in the enterprise is accelerating, so too are the risks and scrutiny around its use.

Read More