CHEAT SHEET: Comparing EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001

Navigating the evolving and complex landscape for AI governance requirements can be a real challenge for organizations. We’ve created this comprehensive cheat sheet comparing three important compliance frameworks: the EU AI Act, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and ISO 42001. This easy to understand visual maps the similarities and differences between these frameworks, providing a concise reference for organizations implementing responsible AI guardrails.

Share:

Related Posts

Everything You Need to Know About New York’s RAISE Act 

New York became the second state last year to enact a frontier model disclosure law when Governor Kathy Hochul signed the Responsible AI Safety and Education (RAISE) Act. The new law requires frontier model providers to disclose certain safety processes for their models and report certain safety incidents to state regulators, with many similarities to California’s slate of AI laws passed last fall. The RAISE Act will take effect on January 1, 2027. This article covers who must comply with the RAISE Act, what transparency obligations the law creates, and how the law will be enforced.

Read More

Everything You Need to Know About the Executive Order on a National AI Policy Framework (2025)

On December 11, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing the federal government to build a “minimally burdensome” national framework for AI and to push back against state AI laws the Administration views as harmful to innovation. The EO takes a new, novel approach via Executive Branch authority, creating an AI Litigation Task Force and asking the U.S. Department of Commerce to evaluate state AI laws and identify “onerous” laws (explicitly citing laws that require models to “alter their truthful outputs”.)

Read More